11-27-2006, 02:51 AM
|
 |
Ex-Admin and Fat :(
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: The Wild Wild MidWest
Posts: 332
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by batgirl0711
as a researcher who is currently in the process of having my work published, i am on the side which uses credible sources to reference an argument, theory, hypothesis, or opinion.
sparknotes isn't a credible source.
wikipedia often cites primary sources and therefore are 100% more credible than sparknotes. here is why: if i search wikipedia for X and then read the information they have listed on X, i can often find their citations. if i read those articles cited i can see where the summaries and theories located on their site came from.
|
you are a wordy person :eek ill go with you are on Josh's side 
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|